Battle Headquarters

Type 11008/41 Battle HQ, Scatsta.HU 39255 72103

Type 11008/41 Battle HQ, Scatsta. HU 39255 72103

The reason for their construction on or very near Airfields is to provide the ‘Station Commander’ with a secure location from which he could direct the defence of ‘his’ property via landlines and runners in the event of being attacked by hostile ground forces.

Officially known as the Type 11008/41 it is the principal type seen, although there is also a smaller type, the 3329/41, for use on satellite and training airfields.

Ideally, the B.H.Q. was constructed almost entirely below ground for concealment and protection, only the thick, square roof of the O.P. and the safety handrail surrounding the main stairwell being visible. However, if the water table was high then the B.H.Q. was accordingly built higher up, with earth banked up against the sides and over the roof for camouflage and protection.

Inside the layout is unvaried. A few have remains of light fittings; one or two are painted; but most apart from a few screw holes, are devoid of any fittings, installations or signage.

They give the impression that by the time of there construction the invasion scare was over and they were simply left and never equipped.

 Battle Headquarters Layout

The layout was designed to be simple.

BHQ Plan

Type 11008/41 BHQ Plan

A square upper observation room (O.P.) was accessed via a short iron ladder below a steel manhole cover on one side of the 18 inch (45.7cm) thick bomb-proof roof. There are variations in the slope of the O.P. roof. The blueprint shows it to have, “officially” if you like, slightly tapering sides going up to a curved top edge and a flat roof. In practice, probably to the preference of the local ‘Defence Authority’ and/or the builder (heard this before, haven’t we?) it varies from a square-sided slab (Wellingore) through a modestly bevelled top edge (Matlask) to a bold sweeping curve (Polebrook).

The largest was the Control Room for the Commander, his maps and notes; then two smaller rooms, one for the Telephone Exchange and the other for runners/messengers.

Off these were an Elsan Toilet and then a short corridor leading to another flight of concrete steps up to the outside

Battle Headquarters Location

It appears that the siting of the B.H.Q. was usually left to the discretion of the local area Defence Commander, the only traceable official ‘advice’ suggested locating them near hedges or buildings “to aid concealment”. Trouble there, of course, is that hedges and buildings also aid concealment for an enemy with mischief on his mind!

Plotting the B.H.Q.-equipped airfields on the map poses another puzzle. There doesn’t seem to be any reason why one airfield has one and another doesn’t!!!!

Defence of each B.H.Q. itself seems to have been discretionary as well. Mostly it would appear to be down to the locally-decided fieldworks, slit trenches and ‘Dannert’ wire entanglements surrounding the emplacement.

The actual B.H.Q. was incapable of defending itself. This is surprising considering the solidity of construction. There was no provision at all for defensive fire.

 A Note From Paul Francis Airfield Archaeologist

There were three main types of BHQ, the first design MS 2279 of 1940 CO’s Battle Headquarters and Station Control. These were only built at the fighter stations protecting London although now none are thought to survive.

At ground level they look like a 6-sided pillbox, but below this was a room with another larger one adjacent to it (but at a slightly lower level). There is a very good model of one on display at IWM Duxford.

This design was replaced by 3329/41 for fighter stations.

11008/41 was originally for bomber stations but was later built on all stations

 Raf Bircham Newton BHQ

A very unusual BHQ with a round observation turret.

Photographs courtesy of Richard E Flagg

Join The Group

We welcome new members to the PSG. We currently have over 300 members in six countries. Members receive the journal 'Loopholes' three times a year which details recent finds and sites of particular interest.
PSG Membership
For more details about PSG, membership, Pillboxes or Defence Structure related topics contact our Co-ordinator Roger Thomas.

Disclaimer

Defence Structures and sites of all types both above and below ground can be very dangerous. Serious injury or even death can arise from unauthorised entry into such sites and structures. Join a responsible club, group or society who can arrange official visits. The Pillbox Study Group accepts no responsibility for any damages or injuries caused by ignoring this advice.

Top 100 Military Sites


Hit Counter provided by Business Card Holders